Over the past few months, I have dedicated much time to analyzing the social networks of digital diplomacy. My assumption was that ministries of foreign affairs, embassies and other diplomatic institutions now routinely follow one another on social networks such as twitter and Facebook. This assumption was based on the fact that by following their peers online, diplomatic institutions can gather important information such as other nations’ foreign policy initiatives.

However, in the age of digital diplomacy diplomatic institutions are not the only ones to have joined the tweetosphere. World leaders have also flocked to SNS over the past few years. Some, such as US President Barack Obama or India’s Prime Minister Modi, first joined twitter during their political campaigns. Others, such as Iranian President Hasan Rouhani, joined in order to communicate with global audiences and news organizations even though twitter is blocked in their country.

Some world leaders use twitter to promote their domestic agenda. Such is the case with the tweet below published by President Obama which aims to promote the cause of same-sex marriage in the US.

Others use twitter in order to communicate with global audiences as is the case with the tweet below published by India’s Modi ahead of his state visit to Japan.

Modi tweets at Japan

An interesting question is do world leaders follow one another on twitter? The notion that digital diplomacy can be used for direct communication between world leaders first came to light in the famous twitter discourse between former Swedish Foreign Minister Carl Bildt and the Foreign Minister of Bahrain (shown below).

Cral Bildt converation

In an attempt to understand whether world leaders follow one another on twitter, I compiled a sample of 42 world leaders. The accounts comprising this sample are ones that belong to world leaders themselves (i.e., @David_Cameron) as opposed to twitter accounts belonging to their political office (i.e., @Number10gov). Once I had compiled the sample I began exploring connections between world leaders by analyzing the social network of world leaders on twitter. This social network is shown in the image below.

The Social Network of World Leaders

social netowork world leaders

As can be seen, this social network seems to be quite scattered with no densely populated area that comprises the heart of the network. This is a result of the fact that world leaders are not avid followers of their online peers. In fact, the average world leader is followed by only four of his peers.

With that said, there are certain exceptions to this rule. When analyzing the social network of world leaders, I first focused on identifying the ten most popular world leaders among their peers. The most popular world leader is US President Barack Obama who is followed by 24 other world leaders. The second most popular world leader in this network is the UK’s David Cameron while Brazil’s Dilma Rousseff comes in at third followed by Canada’s Stephen Harper, French President François Hollande, Indian PM Modi, Argentina’s Cristina Kirchner, Colombia’s Juan Manuel Santos, Australia’s Tony Abbott and finally Mexico’s Enrique Peña Nieto.

Ten most popular world leaders among their peers

Indegree world leaders

It is important to note that a world leader’s popularity among his peers is not a vanity contest. The more world leaders follow Barack Obama, the greater his ability to disseminate foreign policy messages to his peers.

Next, I attempted to identify the ten most active world leaders (i.e., world leaders that actively follow their peers online). The most “twiploamtic” world leader is Colombia’s Juan Manuel Santos who follows 23 other world leaders. In second place comes Spain’s Mariano Rajoy Brey who follows 20 of his peers. Next comes Brazil’s Dilma Rousseff, Finland’s Alexander Stubb, Mexico’s Enrique Peña Nieto, New Zealand’s John Key, Argentina’s Cristina Kirchner, Belgium’s Elio Di Rupo, India’s Modi and finally Peru’s Presidnet Ollanta Humala Tasso. This parameter is also of great importance as the more world leaders one follows, the greater his ability to gather information regarding world events and foreign policy initiatives.

Ten world leaders that are most avid followers of their peers

outdegree world leaders

Finally, I decided to analyze which world leaders serve as important hubs of information as they connect world leaders that do not follow one another directly. The world leader who is the most important hub of information is US President Barack Obama. In second place comes Norway’s PM Erna Solberg. Next is Spain’s Mariano Rajoy Brey, Colombia’s Juan Manuel Santos, India’s Modi, New Zealand’s John Key, Australia’s Tony Abbott, the UK’s David Cameron and finally Mexico’s Enrique Peña Nieto.

Ten most important hubs of information

betweness world leaders

At the moment, there are only three world leaders that are highly popular, serve as important hubs of information and actively follow their peers and they are India’s PM Narendra Modi, Mexico’s Enrique Peña Nieto and Colombia’s Juan Manuel Santos. In general, this analysis finds that Latin American world leaders are more engaged in Twiplomacy than many European and Eastern European world leaders. Moreover, a country’s newsworthiness does not seem to effect its leader’s popularity among his peers. Iranaian President Rouhani, Israel’s PM Netanyahu and Ukrainian PM Poroshenko are among the least popular leaders in this network despite their country’s high profile.

Finally, it is worth noting that world leaders tend to follow their regional peers. Such is the case with Latin American leaders that all seem to follow one another. As can be seen in the image below, Latin American leaders comprise a hub of their own.

Latin American Hub

This is also the case with African leaders and Asian leaders who also form their own hub as can be seen in the image below.

African and Asaian Hub

 

 

3 responses to “The Social Network of World Leaders on Twitter”

  1. […] exploring the social network of world MFAs, the social network of world leaders and the social network of the United Nations in New York and Geneva, I decided to start 2015 with […]

  2. […] networks (e.g., social network of the UN, social network of Foreign Ministers, social network of World Leaders). This week, I decided to re-analyze the MFA social network. I wanted to learn if the ranking of […]

  3. […] networks of foreign ministries (MFAs), Foreign Ministers, UN Embassies in New York and Geneva and world leaders, I set out to investigate the social network of bi-lateral embassies to the United States. While […]

Leave a comment

Trending